European and national funding for radioecology was substantial after the Chernobyl accident, but has since declined. In the last decade, the number of radioecologists has been steadily reducing with significant gaps occurring in many countries in the expertise needed to cover the many different facets of radioecology.
Recent reports have identified the need to ensure that the discipline is maintained across Europe and beyond. Some Member States may not be able adequately to respond to future large scale accidents or to address knowledge gaps in respect to new regulatory requirements. Issues within radiation protection are cross-boundary and we may need to bring together the remaining European radioecological expertise to make best use of experience and resources, and ensure an appropriate future for radioecology in Europe.
The primary objective of this Coordination Action (CA) is to evaluate the feasibility of network(s) to maintain and enhance competence and to enhance sustainable collaboration in the field of assessment and management of the impact of radionuclides on man and the environment.
To reach this objective, the present CA proposes a number of tasks that include:
From these tasks, the output of the project will be an evaluation of the potential for establishing deeper and sustainable collaboration in radioecology possibly in the form of Network(s) of Excellence. The suitable scope, extent and structure of the network(s) will be explored.
The overall objective of the FUTURAE project is to evaluate the feasibility of network(s) of excellence to maintain and enhance competence in a resource efficient manner and to enhance sustainable collaboration in the field of assessment and management of the impact of radionuclides on man and the environment.
This project is hence under the umbrella of radioecology defined as a branch of environmental sciences devoted to a specific category of stressors i.e. natural and artificial radioactive substances.
This science includes key issues
The feasibility of networking will be critically evaluated in a final report that will integrate the results of reviews and analyses, and the outcomes from workshops where end-user representatives will have the opportunity to express their views.
Work packages
This approach will be implemented through the coordination of five work packages, in accordance with the specific WP objectives set out below:
Participant list
| Partic. role* | Partic. no. | Participant name | Participant short name | Country |
| CO | 1 | Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety | IRSN | France |
| CR | 2 | Swedish Radiation Protection Authority | SSI | Sweden |
| CR | 3 | Centre for Ecology and Hydrology | CEH | UK |
| CR | 4 | Belgian Nuclear Research Centre | SCK•CEN | Belgium |
| CR | 5 | Research Centre in Energy, Environment and Technology | CIEMAT | Spain |
| CR | 6 | University of Antwerp | UA | Belgium |
| CR | 7 | Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority | STUK | Finland |
| CR | 8 | Jozef Stefan Institute | JSI | Slovenia |
| CR | 9 | Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority | NRPA | Norway |
Website: www.futurae.org
Contact person(s)